Zhu Yi arrives exactly on time.

He’s older than I expected, maybe late fifties, with the specific kind of unhurried confidence that belongs to people who’ve spent decades being the most technically competent person in any given room. He shakes hands with Elliot first, then me, and his grip is brief and assessing.

"Mr. Li." He glances at the sketches already spread across the table. "First time working with a structural consultant?"

"Yes."

"Good." He sets down his bag. "Then we won’t have to unlearn anything."

I’m not entirely sure if that’s a compliment.

Peng Hao runs through the session structure quickly, forty minutes of presentation, open review after, and then steps back to let us work. He does this well, I’ve noticed, the way he creates space without disappearing entirely.

Elliot and I have already arranged the materials. Site plan in the center, load projections to the left, the preliminary canopy sketches I finished last night along the right edge.

We’d messaged briefly yesterday to confirm what each of us was bringing. It was efficient. We’re getting better at the logistics of working together even when we haven’t been in the same room.

"Walk me through it," Zhu Yi says, settling into his chair.

Elliot starts with the density framework, the residential clustering logic, how the building orientations relate to the green space proportions. He’s clear and direct, doesn’t overexplain. I watch Zhu Yi’s expression while Elliot talks and it stays neutral, which I’ve already decided means he’s listening seriously.

Then it comes to me.

"The circulation," I say, and pull the load projection sheet forward. "The original framework assumed uniform distribution across three entry nodes. That assumption doesn’t hold once you factor in the eastern cluster’s proximity to the main green corridor."

I walk him through the node two problem. The evening peak concentration, the revised tolerance figures, the staggered access point solution that redistributes load without requiring us to widen the corridor itself, which would compromise the sustainability metrics Elliot and I had agreed to protect.

Zhu Yi doesn’t say anything while I present. He looks at the numbers, looks at the sketches, looks back at the numbers.

Then: "What’s your confidence level on the peak projection figures?"

"High for the eastern cluster. The western cluster has a variable I haven’t fully resolved yet. The residential density there is still being finalized."

"So the western node tolerances are preliminary."

"Yes. I’ve flagged them." I point to the notation on the sheet. "I didn’t want to present them as settled."

Zhu Yi looks at the notation. Something in his expression shifts slightly, not warmth exactly, but a kind of attention that feels different from the baseline.

"Good," he says. "Don’t."

He moves on to the canopy sketches.

The next twenty minutes are harder. Zhu Yi has opinions about drainage that I hadn’t fully accounted for in the canopy positioning, not because I’d ignored drainage but because I’d weighted pedestrian flow over it in the preliminary design.

He’s not wrong to push on it.

But his proposed adjustment would shift the canopy angle in a way that changes the light quality in the corridor during morning hours, and the morning light was a deliberate choice, something Elliot and I had discussed specifically because the green corridor needed to feel like somewhere people actually wanted to be, not just a functional path between buildings.

I listen to Zhu Yi’s reasoning all the way through before I respond.

"The drainage concern is valid," I say. "But if we adjust the angle that way, we lose the eastern morning light entirely. That affects how the corridor reads between seven and nine AM, which is peak commute. The experience of the space matters to whether people use it."

Zhu Yi looks at me.

"This is a structural review," he says.

"I know. But the circulation numbers depend on people choosing the green corridor over the street-level alternative. If the space doesn’t feel worth choosing, the load projections don’t hold either." I pause. "The structural solution needs to account for that or we’re solving the wrong problem."

There’s a silence.

Elliot is very still across the table.

Zhu Yi taps his pen once against the table surface. "There’s a middle position," he says finally. "Fifteen degrees rather than twenty-two. You retain most of the morning light, drainage improves adequately. Not perfectly, but adequately."

"That works," I say.

He nods once, makes the notation, and moves on.

I don’t look at Elliot. But I’m aware of him looking at me.

The rest of the session is productive in the specific way good technical work is productive, problems identified, solutions tested, some resolved and some deferred with clear next steps.

By the time Peng Hao returns to close out, we’ve covered more ground than I’d expected. The preliminary canopy design needs revision but not a complete rethink. The western cluster tolerances are officially flagged as a priority for next session. The node two solution is approved as a framework, pending the western figures.

"Strong session," Peng Hao says, looking at the updated sketches. He seems genuinely pleased. "Zhu Yi, anything to add before we close?"

"The approach is sound." Zhu Yi is already repacking his bag. "The integration logic is more developed than I usually see at this stage." He glances between us briefly. "Don’t lose that in the execution."

Then he leaves, unhurried, the same way he arrived.

Peng Hao follows shortly after with a reminder about the next Monday session and some notes about site visit scheduling that’s coming up in a few weeks. And then it’s just Elliot and me, and the table covered in marked-up sketches, and the particular quiet of a room after focused work.

Elliot starts stacking papers. He doesn’t say anything for a moment.

Then: "You pushed back on Zhu Yi."

"The angle change would have affected the morning light."

"I know. I was watching." He sets down the stack. "I just didn’t expect you to."

I’m not entirely sure what to say to that, so I don’t say anything.

"Coffee?" Elliot asks. "There’s a place two blocks down. We could debrief before we go back."

I consider it. Thursday afternoon, the session ran slightly long, it’s almost three. I have the drive back, work I could return to, the study and its particular quality of silence.

Nothing that couldn’t wait an hour.

"Sure," I say.

***

The place Elliot chooses is small, the kind of café that fills up with laptop workers in the morning and empties to almost nothing by mid-afternoon.

We’re among the only people there. He orders an Americano without looking at the menu, which suggests he’s been here before. I order green tea because the thought of coffee still occasionally turns my stomach, a pregnancy remnant I’ve stopped mentioning to anyone.

We sit across from each other in the window seats, papers in bags, the session officially finished.

"The western cluster tolerances," Elliot says. "You have a timeline on those?"

"Depends on when you finalize the density figures. If I have them by Saturday, I can have preliminary tolerances before Monday."

"I can do Saturday." He wraps both hands around his cup. "The drainage compromise was good, by the way. I was trying to figure out how to argue it and you’d already done it."

"The numbers support the light choice."

"I know they do. I just hadn’t framed it that way." He pauses. "You linked that on the fly?"

"What?"

"Connecting the light quality to the circulation projections. Using one to defend the other."

I think about it. "The corridor only works if people use it. If people don’t use it, the load model fails. So everything that affects whether people use it is technically part of the load model."

Elliot is quiet for a moment, looking at his coffee.

"...That’s a cleaner argument than I usually build," he says. It’s not flattery. It sounds like an observation he’s making to himself as much as to me.

I drink my tea.

Outside, a delivery truck is blocking the street. The driver is arguing with someone. Normal afternoon noise, muffled by the glass.

"Can I ask you something?" Elliot says.

"Go ahead."

"Why did you enter the competition under Li Runze and not Wuchen?"

The question is direct but not unfriendly. He’s not prying, just asking what he’s been wondering.

"Because the work is mine," I say. "Not the name."

He nods like that’s a sufficient answer.

"The site visit’s coming up in three weeks," he says, shifting back. "Peng Hao will send the details but it’s a mixed-use development in the eastern district, comparable scale. Useful to see the construction sequencing in person."

"I’ll be there."

"Good." He finishes his coffee, sets the cup down. "You’re harder to read than I expected."

I look at him.

"Not a complaint," he says. "I just thought, first session, I thought I had a sense of you. Then today." He shrugs slightly. "I didn’t."

"What did you expect?"

"Someone more eager to prove something." He says it without judgment. "A lot of people in your position would be."

My position. Second place, younger, no formal credentials, working beside someone who came first.

"I’m here to build something that works," I say. "That’s all."

Elliot looks at me for a moment, then he picks up his bag.

"Monday," he says.

"Monday," I confirm.

We leave separately, him heading left toward the subway, me toward where Liang Feng is waiting with the car. The afternoon is cooler than the morning was, the sky doing something complicated with clouds that hasn’t decided whether it’s going to rain.

I get in the car and lean back against the seat.

The session had gone well. The work was solid. Zhu Yi had said the integration logic was more developed than he usually saw at this stage, and he hadn’t seemed like someone who said things for the sake of saying them.

The footrest crossed my mind briefly, and I set it aside.

I had revisions to prepare before Saturday.

That was enough for now.