The Villain Has Something to Say - Chapter 78 - Jianiqng, I Like You & This is Not Couple Cultivation! (I)

Jin Lin was not an object within the pond; he would transform into a dragon upon meeting the wind and clouds!

Yu Haoran returned to his youth. Not only did he retain all the memories of his past life, but he also obtained omniscient and omniscient domain towers that could accelerate time.

Look at him: Seize opportunities, seize good fortune, destroy enemies, stir up trouble!

This was a story of leveling up and killing monsters.

- Description from Novelupdates

God rewards hard work, and there must be rewards for paying.

And no matter how hard you work, you will gain 100%!

So, for things like cultivating immortals, don’t you just need to have hands?

- Description from novelbuddy

[“Blood Transformation Scripture” awakens low-level spiritual wisdom. 】

[“Blood Transformation Scripture” unlocks personality: Will drink. 】

[“Dragon Elephant Prajna Sutra” and “Karma Transformation Art” share the same interests, unlocking the fetters: purification. 】

[“Hundred Eight Troubles Worship” unlocks personality: seek defeat. 】

[“Infinite Sealing Method” unlocks the advanced form: Little Black House. 】

[“Linglong Mind Scheming” was imprisoned in a small black room, and reflected on his personality: Yidao. 】

I have a mirror.

Zuo Shu’s ‘psychic’.

Right book ‘Jieyu’.

In the middle it says Tongtian Dao!

The QQ group of this book: 530113513, welcome everyone to join.

- Description from novelbuddy

In a romance novel called “The Secret Lovers of the Academy” the male lead would often torment his fiancée–but wait, why did she cross into this world to become his fiancée, the villainess, instead of the heroine?

Louise Sweeney found the perfect solution to escape the misfortune of being the villainess: “Your Highness, I just want to tell you that we don’t have to be tied with our engagement. We weren’t even officially engaged, right?”

But what was wrong with the male lead’s reaction? To her suggestion, he replied “But our engagement wasn’t false, don’t you agree?”